Thursday, January 20, 2011
Reflection on Keller Plan/PSI Model
What are your initial reactions to this theory/model? What are barriers to its use? What benefits might be expected for those who overcome the barriers?
My first thought when learning about the Keller Plan/PSI model was "Oh, that's basically what my online classes have been." After reading more, I see there are some differences. Although my online classes through NC State have mostly been comprised of asychorous elements, such as taped lectures and online readings and activities, the courses have still been guided by a weekly schedule. Whether other students and myself have mastered objectives or not, most classes are going to be rolling on to new concepts each week.
As mentioned in the Davis/Ragsdell article, advantages to the PSI model include being able to reach students outside the usual barriers of time and physical space of a classroom setting. It allows students to work at their own pace without being held back or accelerated at an inappropriate time. The main barrier I see to this type of learning, however, is that it requires a highly motivated and independent student.
Would you attempt to use this theory/model with the students you are currently teaching or hope to teach in the future? Why or why not? Could elements of the theory/model be modified so that it would work with your current/future students?
Last semester, I took a course called "Design and Evaluation of Instructional Materials." Our main course project was to create an online course for our current students. I teach fourth grade and created a course on map reading with 5 sessions (or modules) that each built upon each other. In retrospect, this project mostly followed the Keller Plan because it was very objective-driven with assessments at the end of each module, requiring mastery before moving to the next module. Students could move through the course at their own pace.
As was mentioned in the lecture, however, this approach does have to be modified to meet the needs of younger learners, such as the ones I was (and still am) teaching. Many of the students had to be closely monitored while working on the computer to make sure they were staying focused on the learning objectives. I think in order to make the PSI plan work for younger learners, the modules need to be very interactive and include various forms of multimedia (videos, games, etc.) to keep students engaged.
Since we're taking learning theories/models that were not necessarily created with the Web in mind and turning them into Web modules, what Web-based tools or resources could be leveraged to carry out this learning theory/model online?
I think the most obvious modification to make the Keller Plan work in a online setting is to create quizzes to test for mastery using a program such as Quizstar. Programs like this can be set to provide immediate feedback similar to how a students assistant or proctor would in a physical setting. Another tool that is useful for younger learners is Voki which can be used to narrate reading passages to help keep less motivated students engaged.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You did a great job on your "course on map reading" presentation. How long did it take you to create it?
ReplyDeleteI think using Voki audio characters is a great way to bring audio into learning. The kids will love it. I was always wondering how to do this, and now I know, after reading your blog comments. Great job!
I think motivation is definitely a key barrier/hurdle with the PSI model - kind of like a turn key so that if you can get that right, you can be successful. I like your suggestion of incorporating game-like aspects when designing lessons, to help with motivation, and I've been thinking about how to do that in relation to library orientation/instruction. Here are a couple of videos that got me thinking about game dynamics in relation to behavior modification (and perhaps you may also be interested in, if you have not seen them already):
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ted.com/talks/seth_priebatsch_the_game_layer_on_top_of_the_world.html
and
http://g4tv.com/videos/44277/dice-2010-design-outside-the-box-presentation/
btw, I really like how you've set up your blog with our classmates on the side - looks great!
Rachel, that's interesting to hear you make the connection between many of our online courses and the PSI model. I think that's true for the most part with a lot of self-paced work, and assessment coming from projects. I was wondering over winter break if our grad students/adult students would be interested in having non-graded quizzes or interactions after each weeks' lecture or material is presented. We were looking into buying a program called Raptivity to create those types of exercises (which also provide feedback on how much you've learned). Do you think our grad students/adult learners would be interested in such interactions? Some of them seem geared toward K-12 students, like wheel of fortune and jeopardy type games. I'm interested in developing such items to improve our courses, I just didn't have a feel for whether or not our learners would be interested in using such things. Some might find them too cute, or a waste of time, and just prefer to get on with their projects and student-student communication. I would be interested what you and others thought of such a thing in our online courses?
ReplyDeleteKevin -
ReplyDeleteOne of my co-workers is getting her masters online through USF and is taking a course this semester on instructional design that is being taught by James Carey of the Dick & Carey & Carey. She was telling me how much she loves the weekly quizzes that she can take as many times as she wants that help her apply the theory to practical problems. Taking the quizzes becomes a form of learning, not just reiteration. I personally would love the opportunity. I have this perverse love of assessments because I think they are mysteries or problems to be solved. I am sure I need to see a therapist for this affliction but since the budget is tight I will live with it!